[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F0BC1C.5020005@trash.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:45:48 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gre: minor cleanups in netlink interface
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> I noticed the interface expects to always get a full configuration
>>> on change requests. Is there are particular reason for not
>>> supporting incremental changes, lets say
>>>
>>> "ip link change dev gre0 type gre remote <new remote>"
>>>
>>> ? It looks easy enough to change, so I could take care of this.
>>
>> I think this should be done in iproute. That way the user (or
>> rather the user-space programmer) gets to choose the behaviour.
>> This is also how the existing interface works too.
>
> We don't have much precedent for rtnl_link besides VLAN (which
> does support incremental changes), but actually all other route
> netlink interfaces do support incremental changes by sending only
> a subset of the attributes. A reason for supporting this in the
> interface is that incremental userspace changes will always be
> racy because you need two seperate operations.
Its actually also what defines the difference between using
NLM_F_REPLACE (ip link replace) and no flags (ip link change).
The former replaces the replaces the object, the later changes
an existing object.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists