[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081011151820.GB7520@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:18:20 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gre: minor cleanups in netlink interface
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:48PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> Its actually also what defines the difference between using
> NLM_F_REPLACE (ip link replace) and no flags (ip link change).
> The former replaces the replaces the object, the later changes
> an existing object.
That wasn't the case historically. For routing NLM_F_REPLACE
had a real meaning because you can have routes that differ only
by scope. So if you considered routes that are otherwise the
same to be duplicate routes, then NLM_F_REPLACE tells you whether
you're allowed to create a new route or you must modify one
of the existing ones. Of course completely duplicate routes
where everything is equal is not allowed.
Of course NLM_F_REPLACE has since been seconded for other purposes
so I suppose it can mean whatever you want for rtnl link :)
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists