lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081013.004226.171259546.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	berni@...kenwald.de
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: WARNING (skb_gso_segment) with tg3+bridge in 2.6.27

From: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@...kenwald.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:20:03 +0200

> [  289.588669] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  289.588673] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1505 skb_gso_segment+0x82/0x1a7()
> 
>         if (WARN_ON(skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)) {

So this is via tg3_tso_bug()

 ...
> [  289.588760]  [<ffffffff803d14ab>] dev_queue_xmit+0x3aa/0x462
> [  289.588778]  [<ffffffffa024ca8c>] ip6_output+0xce7/0xcff [ipv6]
> [  289.588785]  [<ffffffffa023ade0>] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x75/0x79 [bridge]
> [  289.588792]  [<ffffffffa023a2fe>] br_dev_xmit+0x66/0x7c [bridge]
> [  289.588795]  [<ffffffff803d1535>] dev_queue_xmit+0x434/0x462
> [  289.588811]  [<ffffffffa024ca8c>] ip6_output+0xce7/0xcff [ipv6]
> [  289.588827]  [<ffffffffa024b8b4>] ip6_xmit+0x35c/0x439 [ipv6]
> [  289.588848]  [<ffffffffa026d303>] inet6_csk_xmit+0x223/0x236 [ipv6]
> [  289.588850]  [<ffffffff80443e8e>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x21/0x29
> [  289.588853]  [<ffffffff804059ff>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x60f/0x64e

And it seems we have a TCP TSO frame that went through bridging
netfilter.

Herbert, is there something about checksum state changing done
by bridging netfilter that we have to be mindful of in
skb_gso_segment() and therefore not consider "!= CHECKSUM_PARTIAL"
a warn-worthy case?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ