[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F52E89.9050104@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:43:05 -0400
From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: afleming@...il.com, afleming@...escale.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change S390 anti-dependency to CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
dependency
David Miller wrote:
> From: "Andy Fleming" <afleming@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:21:44 -0500
>
>> Argh. From what I could see, we have request_irq, free_irq,
>> disable_irq, enable_irq, and disable_irq_nosync. For the PHYLIB, it
>> shouldn't be difficult to modify things so that it doesn't compile in
>> interrupt support if the system doesn't support them. Shouldn't, that
>> is, if there's some config option that tells me whether those
>> functions exist.
>
> I think this whole situation with s390 is rediculious.
>
> If s390 is weird and lacks these fundamental things, that's fine.
> What isn't fine is how we're handling this.
>
> No code should care or even be aware of this.
>
> S390 should simply provide a set of dummy DMA and interrupt interface
> stubs that always fail and return an error value.
>
> Then we can get rid of this S390 Kconfig stuff which has been spewed
> all over the place.
"depends on PCI" has always worked for me. Any reason we can't use that
here?
-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists