[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F7072A.908@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:19:38 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, billfink@...dspring.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
johnpol@....mipt.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: implement emergency route cache rebulds when gc_elasticity
is exceeded
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:26:55 -0400
>
>> If this meets everyones approval I think we can follow up with a
>> patch to remove the secret interval code entirely.
>
> This patch looks pretty good to me.
>
> Just some minor coding style nits:
>
>> +static void rt_secret_rebuild_oneshot(struct net *net) {
>
> Openning brace on new line please.
>
>> +static void rt_emergency_hash_rebuild(struct net *net) {
>
> Likewise.
>
>
While browsing Neil patch, I found one missing rcu_assign_pointer()
in current code. I added a comment similar to other rcu_assign_pointer()
in rt_intern_hash() function.
[PATCH] ip: adds a missing rcu_assign_pointer()
rt_intern_hash() is doing an update of a RCU guarded hash chain
without using rcu_assign_pointer() or equivalent barrier.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
View attachment "ipv4_route.patch" of type "text/plain" (497 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists