netdev - Re: [PATCH] sctp: rfc conformance fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081023061514.GA14658@verge.net.au>
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:15:16 +1100
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	vladislav.yasevich@...com, jk@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: rfc conformance fixes

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:06:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:24:47 -0400
> 
> > David Miller wrote:
> > > From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
> > > 
> > >> From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
> > >> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:54:02 +1100
> > >>
> > >>>> Oddly enough, none of this series made it to patchwork.
> > >>> I'll chase this up then - could you formward a copy of one of the 
> > >>> messages after it has come through the list?
> > >> Here is one of them.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I'm a bozo, that was a copy that made it privately to me.
> > > 
> > > I don't have any copies in my inbox that came via vger.
> > > 
> > 
> > Really?  They made it to vger and back out.  They are also in
> > the archive or marc.   I wonder which black hole some of them
> > disappeared to... :)
> 
> I meant that I didn't save any such copies.
> 
> When I read my email I always get 2, 3, 4 copies of every damn
> patch, so I delete all but one of those and I happened to save only
> the instances that were directly sent to me this time.  It's just
> random what happens.

For what it is worth, I use the following procmail rule to elimintate
duplicate messages based on Message-Id.

	PROCMAIL_ROOT=${HOME}/.procmail

        :0
	* ? /usr/bin/formail -D 819200 ${PROCMAIL_ROOT}/log/message.cache
	/dev/null

-- 
Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/             W: www.valinux.co.jp/en

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html