[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0810271441590.12928@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:42:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rjw@...k.pl,
s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > real world workloads. If your fairness hurts throughput that much maybe
> > your scheduler algorithm is just plain *wrong* as it isn't adapting to
> > workload at all well.
> Doesn't seem to be scheduler/fairness. 2.6.22.19 is O(1), and falls
> apart too, I posted the numbers and full dbench output yesterday.
We'll need to look into this a little bit more I think. I have sent out
some numbers too, and these indicate very clearly that there is more than
50% performance drop (measured by dbench) just after the very merge of CFS
in 2.6.23-rc1 merge window.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists