[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49061F87.2090409@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:07:35 -0400
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@...com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: send IPv6 neighbor advertisement on failover
Hi Jay,
Did you ever get a chance to look at this patch? Now that net-next is
open I'd like to resubmit it.
Thanks,
-Brian
Brian Haley wrote:
> Updated to address Vlad's comment about storing the link-local IPv6
> address in the bond/vlan structure, I no longer overwrite the existing
> address with a newer one. Also added missed locking for the inet6_dev.
>
> I don't see any way to address David Steven's comment since there is
> currently no NA tunable in the IPv6 code.
>
> ---
>
> This patch adds better IPv6 failover support for bonding devices,
> especially when in active-backup mode and there are only IPv6 addresses
> configured, as reported by Alex Sidorenko.
>
> - Creates a new file, net/drivers/bonding/bond_ipv6.c, for the
> IPv6-specific routines. Both regular bonds and VLANs over bonds
> are supported.
>
> - Adds a new tunable, num_unsol_na, to limit the number of unsolicited
> IPv6 Neighbor Advertisements that are sent on a failover event.
> Default is 1.
>
> - Creates two new IPv6 neighbor discovery functions:
>
> ndisc_build_skb()
> ndisc_send_skb()
>
> These were required to support VLANs since we have to be able to
> add the VLAN id to the skb since ndisc_send_na() and friends
> shouldn't be asked to do this. These two routines are basically
> __ndisc_send() split into two pieces, in a slightly different order.
>
> - Updates Documentation/networking/bonding.txt and bumps the rev of bond
> support to 3.4.0.
>
> On failover, this new code will generate one packet:
>
> - An unsolicited IPv6 Neighbor Advertisement, which helps the switch
> learn that the address has moved to the new slave.
>
> Testing has shown that sending just the NA results in pretty good
> behavior when in active-back mode, I saw no lost ping packets for example.
>
> -Brian
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
> ---
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists