| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49073F7D.3090108@trash.net> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:36:13 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> CC: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: nf-next-2.6.git Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:32 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 13:26 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>> Since Dave has created his net-next-2.6.git tree, I'm now also >>>> taking netfilter patches for 2.6.29. The nf-next-2.6.git tree >>>> is located at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nf-next-2.6.git >>> Should either or both of git trees be added to >>> MAINTAINERS: NETFILTER/IPTABLES/IPCHAINS? >>> >>> T: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nft-2.6.git >>> T: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nf-next-2.6.git >> The first one is a development tree for something not inside >> the kernel yet. Adding the second one would be fine. > > I believe you got the order reversed. > > This below could/should be added yes? > > T: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nft-2.6.git No, thats the nftables development tree. That one will reset, rebase etc. and none of the code inside it is merged. nf-next-2.6.git is the tree I'll regulary ask Dave to merge. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists