netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/6] netns: configurable number of initial network namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49075842.6000901@trash.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:21:54 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Vivien Chappelier <vivien.chappelier@...mson.net>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>, jleu@...dspring.com,
	linux-vrf-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] netns: configurable number of initial network	namespaces

Vivien Chappelier wrote:
>    Yes; the linux-vrf patches had a new netlink message to create/remove 
> the equivalent of a network namespace (ip vrf add 1). I've not ported 
> this feature yet, so this patch is meant to provide another way of 
> setting up networking stacks without the need for a new process for each 
> stack. The ability to dynamically create/remove networking stacks from 
> userspace would definitely be useful.

I see, I didn't realize the process that created a namespace
needs to be kept running. So yes, creating standalone network
namespaces seems to make sense.

>    There are also some very minor advantages in creating the namespaces 
> statically at boot time, such as increasing the chances that the 
> allocation works (though network namespaces are quite small), and 
> improving boot time by avoiding a few calls to /sbin/ip on startup. 
> Since we are running on embedded devices, that is something that matter 
> to us, but it may not be enough to justify the need for this feature. 
> Anyway, I do not think it hurts to have the ability to create static 
> networking stacks at boot time.

I don't have an opinion on this. Thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html