netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081029183840.GD6732@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:38:40 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dada1@...mosbay.com, minyard@....org, shemminger@...tta.com,
	benny+usenet@...rsen.dk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	johnpol@....mipt.ru, christian@...i.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:29:56AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:11:14 -0700
> 
> > OK.  However, this reasoning assumes that a socket with a given
> > udp_hashfn() value will appear on one and only one list.  There are no
> > side lists for sockets in other states?  (listen, &c)
> 
> Nope, with UDP things are very simple, just one hash table.

Cool!  That does make things easier.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html