[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810291612.46074.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:12:45 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: arm allmodconfig
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 9:53:02 am Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 8:56:04 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c: In function
> > > `netlbl_mgmt_listentry': net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c:268:
> > > warning: 'ret_val' might be used uninitialized in this function
> >
> > Assumes that netlbl_af4list_foreach_rcu() will never iterate zero
> > times.
> >
> > Assumes that entry->type can never have an unexpected value.
> >
> > gcc cannot get this right, and C-level changes will be needed to
> > shut this up.
>
> No idea why this didn't come up when I was compiling this ... oh
> well, good thing I'm not a proud guy :) I'll get this fixed and post
> a patch later today.
I updated my lblnet-2.6_next tree with a fix as well as another patch
from Roel Kluin to fix a signed/unsigned mistake. I'll post the
patches to the relevant lists but I'm waiting one more patch from
someone first.
In the meantime, interested parties can find the git tree here:
* git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_next
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists