netdev - Re: [PATCH] CUBIC v2.3 with new improved slow start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081029153928.3d47e26f@extreme>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:39:28 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	"Injong Rhee" <rhee@....ncsu.edu>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CUBIC v2.3 with new improved slow start

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:28:26 -0400
"Injong Rhee" <rhee@....ncsu.edu> wrote:

> I am releasing a new patch for CUBIC. This patch implements a new slow start 
> mechanism called HyStart. There were some discussions in the mailing list on 
> the poor performance of TCP slow start; our patch addresses those 
> performance issues arising from slow start.  For more information, please 
> refer to the following technical report:
> 
>  Sangtae Ha and Injong Rhee, "Taming the Elephants: New TCP Slow
> Start", NCSU Technical Report 2008. Available at
> http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/export/hystart_techreport_2008.pdf
> 
> 
> The new update improves the start-up throughput of CUBIC substantially by 
> avoiding system overloading during slow start and shortening the 
> fast-recovery period after slow start. The key performance issues arising 
> when Linux is used with Windows XP or FreeBSD receivers are also addressed. 
> Our tests over Internet2 paths are very encouraging. The scheme is verified 
> to work well even for asymmetric paths,  with diverse receiver settings of 
> delayed acknowledgements, and with various operating systems (Windows XP and 
> FreeBSD). You can find the testing results from
> 
> http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_Testing
> 
> Please let us know if there are other performance issues of TCP that you 
> want us to look into.
> 
> Injong and Sangtae.
> 

This looks like a good optimization, it obviously needs more testing
because Linux always seems to find new broken hardware.  The areas
that need to be tested should include:
  * MacOs has a broken version of delayed ack that might cause
    HyStart to radically underestimate.
  * Applications that dribble out packets might get better (or
    worse) performance.  This include dumb web servers.
  * Does this increase or reduce latency when using TCP for
    applications which never fill the congestion window? (games, financial, etc).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html