[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <490838C6.4060304@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:19:50 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: shemminger@...tta.com, benny+usenet@...rsen.dk, minyard@....org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, christian@...i.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:23:03 +0100
>
>> David Miller a écrit :
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:45:15 +0100
>>>
>>>> I will submit a new patch serie tomorrow, with :
>>>>
>>>> Patch 1 : spinlocks instead of rwlocks, and bug spotted by Christian Bell
>>>>
>>>> Patch 2 : splited on two parts (2 & 3) , one for IPV4, one for IPV6,
>>> I very much look forward to this :-)
>>> I like these changes and can't wait to add them to net-next-2.6
>> Thanks David, please find first updated patch 1
>
> Applied, please (re-)send the current version of patch 2 as well.
I found a fatal bug in /proc/net/udp handling, sorry.
[PATCH] udp: udp_get_next() should use spin_unlock_bh()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
View attachment "udp_3.patch" of type "text/plain" (500 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists