netdev - Re: atl1 warn_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4908649A.6010005@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:26:50 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC:	Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atl1 warn_on_slowpath help

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:09:08PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>   
>>> As a matter of fact without this patch it's not so apparent why
>>> netif_receive_skb() can't happen after netif_nit_deliver() in
>>> __vlan_hwaccel_rx() too.
>>>       
>> I don't understand what you're saying.
>>     
>
> It's still about this bypassing: netif_receive_skb() can be called
> after netif_nit_deliver().
>   

I still don't follow - are you talking about the code with out
without this patch? In the later case, why should we call it
recursively without the need to do so?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html