netdev - Re: FYI - TCP/IP thin stream latency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4908A7BC.1060905@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:13:16 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	shemminger@...tta.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
	doug.leith@...m.ie, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FYI - TCP/IP thin stream latency

David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:59:38 -0700
> 
> 
>>I was reading "Removing Exponential Backoff from TCP" by Mondal and
>>Kusmznovic at Northwesetern in ACM CCR. The paper tries to show that
>>nothing breaks by getting rid of backoff. Interestingly, FreeBSD
>>already doesn't do backoff until after 5th retry.
> 
> 
> Cell phone network folks want this (or something like it) too.

Wouldn't one get that by being able to tune TCP_RTO_MAX on some sort of 
basis (per dest perhaps)?

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html