[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <75E689AC-0AA6-4AB2-A7D9-0B16EDB5AF28@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:29:07 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Santwona.Behera@....COM
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, gkernel-commit@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@....COM>
Subject: Re: Interface proposal for rx classification using ethtool
On Sep 29, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Santwona.Behera@....COM wrote:
> Here is the proposed design for implementing an interface to add,
> delete and
> manage rules for RX packet classification on ethertool with niu as
> the first
> target hardware. This is the second installment of network flow
> classification
> support (the first one was for rx flow distribution based on hashing
> that was
> added in June). Please review and send your feedback.
>
> 1. The ethertool application will have an interface to add a
> classification rule
> and the target RX ring for packets that match the rule. The rules
> are added
> on a per port basis. Each new rule that is added is represented by a
> unique ID.
> This ID can be used by the user to delete the rule or query the
> details of the
> rule (both interfaces provided via ethertool).
>
> 2. Here is the list of cmds/interfaces that will be added to
> ethertool (as
> suboptions in the rx_classification option) to achieve this:
>
> - get the number of RX rings available to this port.
> - add a rule (flow-tuple/mask to RX ring mapping)
> - delete a rule
> - query a particular rule or all rules for this port
>
> 3. Within ethertool, there will be a manager for these rules that
> will order
> the rules on a per port basis according to the policy chosen by the
> user. In
> the first cut, the policy will be hardcoded as longest prefix first
> ordering.
> Before adding any rules to the hardware, the rule manager will first
> query
> the hardware for the ordering that it implements for matching, e.g.,
> low-to-high
> (as in case of niu TCAM). This information will be taken into
> account while
> writing to the rule-manager and to the hardware.
>
> 4. In the niu driver, there will be a local array of the
> tcam_entries (for
> supporting queries from ethertool).
>
> 5. There is no protection against inconsistencies between the tcam
> entries
> and the user view of it that can arise if multiple instances of
> ethertool
> happen to write the same rule (tcam_entry).
What's the state of patches for this work?
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists