netdev - Re: [PATCH] IPVS: Add IPv6 support to LBLC/LBLCR schedulers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43ca39800811031659g4f74e1beh321463953a86f19b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:59:04 +0100
From:	"Julius Volz" <julius.volz@...il.com>
To:	"Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: Add IPv6 support to LBLC/LBLCR schedulers

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:17:12AM +0100, Julius Volz wrote:
>> Add IPv6 support to LBLC and LBLCR schedulers. These were the last
>> schedulers without IPv6 support, but we might want to keep the
>> supports_ipv6 flag in the case of future schedulers without IPv6
>> support.
>
> Hi Julius,
>
> this patch looks fine to me.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>

Thanks!

> With regards to supports_ipv6, I think that it would be better
> to remove it, now that it is unused, and add it (or something similar)
> back if needed as I'm not entirely sure it will ever be needed again.

Agreed and patch sent!

Julius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html