lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:49:29 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: swmike@....pp.se Cc: daniel.blueman@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on? From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@....pp.se> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:46:28 +0100 (CET) > I see that in > <http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers/draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-ecn-00.txt> > there is a recommendation to not use ECN on retransmits, is there > code right now (or planned) to do some kind of "ECN blackhole > detection", ie if no response is received to SYN with ECN set, > continue by sending the second SYN without ECN and keep this > information for the duration of the TCP session? No, we are firmly against any form of ECN blackhole detection. Alexey Kuznetsov and Sally Floyd argued this out exhaustively several years ago. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists