| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:59:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: miklos@...redi.hu
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.bittau@...ucl.ac.uk,
adobriyan@...il.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] net: unix: fix inflight counting bug in garbage
collector
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:23:57 +0100
> This patch fixes the BUG_ON triggered by Andrea's tests. It turned
> out to be completely independent of the stack overflow issue, but
> happens to be triggered by the same test program.
>
> Should qualify for -stable too.
Miklos thanks a lot for fixing this. And Linus thanks for
queueing this up to 2.6.28-rc4
Stable folks, please include this in -stable as soon as you
can, since the BUG can be triggered by local users.
> ----
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> Previously I assumed that the receive queues of candidates don't
> change during the GC. This is only half true, nothing can be received
> from the queues (see comment in unix_gc()), but buffers could be added
> through the other half of the socket pair, which may still have file
> descriptors referring to it.
>
> This can result in inc_inflight_move_tail() erronously increasing the
> "inflight" counter for a unix socket for which dec_inflight() wasn't
> previously called. This in turn can trigger the "BUG_ON(total_refs <
> inflight_refs)" in a later garbage collection run.
>
> Fix this by only manipulating the "inflight" counter for sockets which
> are candidates themselves. Duplicating the file references in
> unix_attach_fds() is also needed to prevent a socket becoming a
> candidate for GC while the skb that contains it is not yet queued.
>
> Reported-by: Andrea Bittau <a.bittau@...ucl.ac.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> CC: stable@...nel.org
> ---
> include/net/af_unix.h | 1 +
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> net/unix/garbage.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux.git/include/net/af_unix.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.orig/include/net/af_unix.h 2008-11-09 14:39:04.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux.git/include/net/af_unix.h 2008-11-09 14:39:11.000000000 +0100
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct unix_sock {
> atomic_long_t inflight;
> spinlock_t lock;
> unsigned int gc_candidate : 1;
> + unsigned int gc_maybe_cycle : 1;
> wait_queue_head_t peer_wait;
> };
> #define unix_sk(__sk) ((struct unix_sock *)__sk)
> Index: linux.git/net/unix/garbage.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.orig/net/unix/garbage.c 2008-11-09 14:39:04.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux.git/net/unix/garbage.c 2008-11-09 14:39:11.000000000 +0100
> @@ -186,8 +186,17 @@ static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x
> */
> struct sock *sk = unix_get_socket(*fp++);
> if (sk) {
> - hit = true;
> - func(unix_sk(sk));
> + struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
> +
> + /*
> + * Ignore non-candidates, they could
> + * have been added to the queues after
> + * starting the garbage collection
> + */
> + if (u->gc_candidate) {
> + hit = true;
> + func(u);
> + }
> }
> }
> if (hit && hitlist != NULL) {
> @@ -249,11 +258,11 @@ static void inc_inflight_move_tail(struc
> {
> atomic_long_inc(&u->inflight);
> /*
> - * If this is still a candidate, move it to the end of the
> - * list, so that it's checked even if it was already passed
> - * over
> + * If this still might be part of a cycle, move it to the end
> + * of the list, so that it's checked even if it was already
> + * passed over
> */
> - if (u->gc_candidate)
> + if (u->gc_maybe_cycle)
> list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_candidates);
> }
>
> @@ -267,6 +276,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
> struct unix_sock *next;
> struct sk_buff_head hitlist;
> struct list_head cursor;
> + LIST_HEAD(not_cycle_list);
>
> spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
>
> @@ -282,10 +292,14 @@ void unix_gc(void)
> *
> * Holding unix_gc_lock will protect these candidates from
> * being detached, and hence from gaining an external
> - * reference. This also means, that since there are no
> - * possible receivers, the receive queues of these sockets are
> - * static during the GC, even though the dequeue is done
> - * before the detach without atomicity guarantees.
> + * reference. Since there are no possible receivers, all
> + * buffers currently on the candidates' queues stay there
> + * during the garbage collection.
> + *
> + * We also know that no new candidate can be added onto the
> + * receive queues. Other, non candidate sockets _can_ be
> + * added to queue, so we must make sure only to touch
> + * candidates.
> */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(u, next, &gc_inflight_list, link) {
> long total_refs;
> @@ -299,6 +313,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
> if (total_refs == inflight_refs) {
> list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_candidates);
> u->gc_candidate = 1;
> + u->gc_maybe_cycle = 1;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -325,14 +340,24 @@ void unix_gc(void)
> list_move(&cursor, &u->link);
>
> if (atomic_long_read(&u->inflight) > 0) {
> - list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_inflight_list);
> - u->gc_candidate = 0;
> + list_move_tail(&u->link, ¬_cycle_list);
> + u->gc_maybe_cycle = 0;
> scan_children(&u->sk, inc_inflight_move_tail, NULL);
> }
> }
> list_del(&cursor);
>
> /*
> + * not_cycle_list contains those sockets which do not make up a
> + * cycle. Restore these to the inflight list.
> + */
> + while (!list_empty(¬_cycle_list)) {
> + u = list_entry(not_cycle_list.next, struct unix_sock, link);
> + u->gc_candidate = 0;
> + list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_inflight_list);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> * Now gc_candidates contains only garbage. Restore original
> * inflight counters for these as well, and remove the skbuffs
> * which are creating the cycle(s).
> Index: linux.git/net/unix/af_unix.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.orig/net/unix/af_unix.c 2008-11-09 14:39:04.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux.git/net/unix/af_unix.c 2008-11-09 14:39:11.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1302,14 +1302,23 @@ static void unix_destruct_fds(struct sk_
> sock_wfree(skb);
> }
>
> -static void unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to duplicate file references for the sake of garbage
> + * collection. Otherwise a socket in the fps might become a
> + * candidate for GC while the skb is not yet queued.
> + */
> + UNIXCB(skb).fp = scm_fp_dup(scm->fp);
> + if (!UNIXCB(skb).fp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> for (i=scm->fp->count-1; i>=0; i--)
> unix_inflight(scm->fp->fp[i]);
> - UNIXCB(skb).fp = scm->fp;
> skb->destructor = unix_destruct_fds;
> - scm->fp = NULL;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1368,8 +1377,11 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct kio
> goto out;
>
> memcpy(UNIXCREDS(skb), &siocb->scm->creds, sizeof(struct ucred));
> - if (siocb->scm->fp)
> - unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
> + if (siocb->scm->fp) {
> + err = unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_free;
> + }
> unix_get_secdata(siocb->scm, skb);
>
> skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
> @@ -1538,8 +1550,13 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct ki
> size = min_t(int, size, skb_tailroom(skb));
>
> memcpy(UNIXCREDS(skb), &siocb->scm->creds, sizeof(struct ucred));
> - if (siocb->scm->fp)
> - unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
> + if (siocb->scm->fp) {
> + err = unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
> + if (err) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + }
>
> if ((err = memcpy_fromiovec(skb_put(skb,size), msg->msg_iov, size)) != 0) {
> kfree_skb(skb);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists