[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:19:43 -0800
From: "Lovich, Vitali" <vlovich@...lcomm.com>
To: Johann Baudy <johaahn@...il.com>
CC: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johann Baudy [mailto:johaahn@...il.com]
> Sent: November-11-08 10:08 AM
> To: Lovich, Vitali
> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING
>
> If there is an error in packet_skb_fill, it returns a negative value
> as error code. If a negative value is returned from packet_skb_fill we
> exit send() procedure and set status of packet to TP_STATUS_USER.
> (this is how error is handled in my last code (not sure committed
> one)).
> Do you want to introduce a new packet status that marks packet as
> ERROR (with TP_STATUS_LOOSING for example?). This way user will be
> able to determine easily the one which is failing?
>
> PS: I need to test my last code at office and I'll send it.
I'm saying that that frame's status should just be set to TP_STATUS_KERNEL, not user. The kernel wants nothing to do with this frame any more and the user needs to know that. I was going to add statistics tracking to keep track of how many packets were sent vs rejected. This was more of an issue with my approach where I had a dedicated kernel thread doing all of this.
Thanks,
Vitali
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists