netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] hardware time stamping + igb example implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081112.141700.88446831.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:17:00 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ak@...ux.intel.com
Cc:	dada1@...mosbay.com, oliver@...tkopp.net, patrick.ohly@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, opurdila@...acom.com,
	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...eo.de, john.ronciak@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] hardware time stamping + igb example
 implementation

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23:37 +0100

> Also I suspect that your percent numbers are wrong, depending on the
> workload.

I think that, considered globally, Eric's estimate is an over-estimate
in fact.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html