netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/4] dccp: Resolve dependencies of features on choice of CCID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081112061402.GA6405@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:14:03 +0100
From:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dccp: Resolve dependencies of features on choice
	of CCID

David, -
| Send me something which actually compiles next time:
| 
| net/dccp/feat.c: In function ???__feat_register_nn???:
| net/dccp/feat.c:252: error: implicit declaration of function ???dccp_feat_default_value???
| net/dccp/feat.c:255: error: implicit declaration of function ???dccp_feat_push_change???
| make[2]: *** [net/dccp/feat.o] Error 1
| make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
| 
Apologies. This was a resubmitted set and patch 2/4, after diff-ing each
of the patches, was found to still have the old format. The set had been
changed to avoid build warnings about dependencies throughout, this
patch unfortunately had the old format.

When resubmitting next I will make sure to only use fresh copies for
each, no matter if it is the same patch. 

Will re-send the 4 from the up-to-date local copies, these are known to
compile without errors/warnings. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html