netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a clock source and system time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081112.020834.114661119.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:08:34 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	patrick.ohly@...el.com
Cc:	ak@...ux.intel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, opurdila@...acom.com,
	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...eo.de, john.ronciak@...el.com,
	dada1@...mosbay.com, oliver@...tkopp.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] time sync: generic infrastructure to map
 between time stamps generated by a clock source and system time

From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:01:38 +0100

> Anyway, I'll try to keep this in mind, but would prefer to not reformat
> the patches unless I have to touch them for other reasons.

That distracts the eyes of the people reviewing the code, because
such people spend most of their time reading code that conforms
to the proper kernel coding style.

Therefore, please fix up these issues rather than defer them.
What does it take like 5 minutes of your time?  About the same
amount of time it took you to say you would defer it?  Come on...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html