[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491AB4F5.2070206@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:50:29 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: #ifdef inet_bind_bucket::ib_net
Alexey Dobriyan a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:45:54PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:19:46 +0300
>>
>>> @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ struct inet_bind_bucket *inet_bind_bucket_create(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
>>> struct inet_bind_bucket *tb = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>
>>> if (tb != NULL) {
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
>>> tb->ib_net = hold_net(net);
>>> +#endif
>>> tb->port = snum;
>>> tb->fastreuse = 0;
>>> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&tb->owners);
>> No, this is exactly what we don't want.
>>
>> If you have to add ifdefs to core C files, you're doing something
>> wrong.
>
> It depends.
>
>> All the details of ifdef this or ifdef that should be hidden in the
>> header files.
>
> It depends.
>
>> You cited an example where there are a ton of ifdefs in some header
>> fule inline function, but that is EXACTLY how this stuff should be
>> done. Those header files are where such ugly implementation details
>> belong.
>>
>> When people read actual code, they should be concerning themselves
>> with control flow, what the code is trying to do, etc. rather then
>> being continually interrupted with ifdef this and ifdef that.
>
> On the other hand, people are interrupted with ctags jumping when suddenly
> whole new file appears, so loss of context is even more. Distance between
> static inline pair tend to increase as people add more stuff in between.
>
> And how this one line ifdef (in one place -- allocation) can interrupt
> control flow when you see it's start and immediately see it's end? Is it
> because ifdef starts at column one, and code on average is two-three tabs
> indented, so eye jumps to column one?
>
> Whey you are suspicious of the code (say, look for a bug) these wrappers
> are nuisaince, because some very smart one may do completely unexpected
> thing wrt it's innocent name. And you check them all because you're
> suspicious.
>
> Netdevices use dev_net_set(). Add ib_net_set() and forget about this hungarian
> pnet thing. const qualifier is also pointless, there maybe nothing wrong with
> it, be there is nothing right as well.
>
> Well, yes, Linus starts blogging and hungarian notation in core networking. :-)
Take a look at include/net/net_namespace.h
I made my best to choose a notation and found :
copy_net_ns(), __put_net(), net_alive(), get_net(), maybe_get_net(),
put_net(), net_eq(), hold_net(), release_net()
What a mess.
I then decided to name my two helpers read_pnet() and write_pnet(), not
because I love hungarion notaion, but to keep existing practice in this
file.
I have no problem to clean the whole file and have a consistent notation.
I have no problem you take care of this.
Thank you
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists