netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a clock source and system time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <491B041A.9040808@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:28:10 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] time sync: generic infrastructure to map	between
 time stamps generated by a clock source and system time

Patrick Ohly a écrit :
> On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 10:08 +0000, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
>> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:01:38 +0100
>>
>>> Anyway, I'll try to keep this in mind, but would prefer to not reformat
>>> the patches unless I have to touch them for other reasons.
>> That distracts the eyes of the people reviewing the code, because
>> such people spend most of their time reading code that conforms
>> to the proper kernel coding style.
> 
> You are right of course. I have changed this and also addressed the
> other comments. I'll give it a few more days in case that there are
> further comments, then resubmit with linux-kernel on CC.
> 
> Should I rebase against net-2.6 or net-next-2.6?
> 

net-next-2.6 is the tree you want to use for new network developments

net-2.6 is for bug fixes only


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html