[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491D3F18.5030505@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:04:24 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: speedup dst_release()
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:09:31 +0100
>
>> During tbench/oprofile sessions, I found that dst_release() was in third position.
> ...
>> Instead of first checking the refcount value, then decrement it,
>> we use atomic_dec_return() to help CPU to make the right memory transaction
>> (ie getting the cache line in exclusive mode)
> ...
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>
> This looks great, applied, thanks Eric.
>
Thanks David
I think I understood some regressions here on 32bits
offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt) is 0x7c again !!!
This is really really bad for performance
I believe this comes from a patch from Alexey Dobriyan
(commit def8b4faff5ca349beafbbfeb2c51f3602a6ef3a
net: reduce structures when XFRM=n)
This kills effort from Zhang Yanmin (and me...)
(commit f1dd9c379cac7d5a76259e7dffcd5f8edc697d17
[NET]: Fix tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1)
Really we must find something so that this damned __refcnt is starting at 0x80
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists