[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0811140940n3efb1963qd5b1aab42dae1c1b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:40:53 -0500
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>, subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
davidel@...ilserver.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, roland@...hat.com,
oleg@...sign.ru, hch@....de, davem@...emloft.net, alan@...hat.com,
jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reintroduce accept4
> Here's the latest version, for review-n-test enjoyment:
Andrew,
I made a few small tweaks to the changelog: wording fixes, and para
break fixes; other than that, changed the text to say that I rewrote
(rather than updated) the test program. Please substitute it with the
following.
Cheers,
Michael
===
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Introduce a new accept4() system call. The addition of this system call
matches analogous changes in 2.6.27 (dup3(), evenfd2(), signalfd4(),
inotify_init1(), epoll_create1(), pipe2()) which added new system calls
that differed from analogous traditional system calls in adding a flags
argument that can be used to access additional functionality.
The accept4() system call is exactly the same as accept(), except that
it adds a flags bit-mask argument. Two flags are initially implemented.
(Most of the new system calls in 2.6.27 also had both of these flags.)
SOCK_CLOEXEC causes the close-on-exec (FD_CLOEXEC) flag to be enabled
for the new file descriptor returned by accept4(). This is a useful
security feature to avoid leaking information in a multithreaded
program where one thread is doing an accept() at the same time as
another thread is doing a fork() plus exec(). More details here:
http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20407.html "Secure File Descriptor Handling",
Ulrich Drepper).
The other flag is SOCK_NONBLOCK, which causes the O_NONBLOCK flag
to be enabled on the new open file description created by accept4().
(This flag is merely a convenience, saving the use of additional calls
fcntl(F_GETFL) and fcntl (F_SETFL) to achieve the same result.
Here's a test program. Works on x86-32. Should work on x86-64, but
I (mtk) don't have a system to hand to test with.
It tests accept4() with each of the four possible combinations of
SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK set/clear in 'flags', and verifies
that the appropriate flags are set on the file descriptor/open file
description returned by accept4().
I tested Ulrich's patch in this thread by applying against 2.6.28-rc2,
and it passes according to my test program.
/* test_accept4.c
Copyright (C) 2008, Linux Foundation, written by Michael Kerrisk
<mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Licensed under the GNU GPLv2 or later.
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define PORT_NUM 33333
#define die(msg) do { perror(msg); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } while (0)
/**********************************************************************/
/* The following is what we need until glibc gets a wrapper for
accept4() */
/* Flags for socket(), socketpair(), accept4() */
#ifndef SOCK_CLOEXEC
#define SOCK_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC
#endif
#ifndef SOCK_NONBLOCK
#define SOCK_NONBLOCK O_NONBLOCK
#endif
#ifdef __x86_64__
#define SYS_accept4 288
#elif __i386__
#define USE_SOCKETCALL 1
#define SYS_ACCEPT4 18
#else
#error "Sorry -- don't know the syscall # on this architecture"
#endif
static int
accept4(int fd, struct sockaddr *sockaddr, socklen_t *addrlen, int flags)
{
printf("Calling accept4(): flags = %x", flags);
if (flags != 0) {
printf(" (");
if (flags & SOCK_CLOEXEC)
printf("SOCK_CLOEXEC");
if ((flags & SOCK_CLOEXEC) && (flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK))
printf(" ");
if (flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK)
printf("SOCK_NONBLOCK");
printf(")");
}
printf("\n");
#if USE_SOCKETCALL
long args[6];
args[0] = fd;
args[1] = (long) sockaddr;
args[2] = (long) addrlen;
args[3] = flags;
return syscall(SYS_socketcall, SYS_ACCEPT4, args);
#else
return syscall(SYS_accept4, fd, sockaddr, addrlen, flags);
#endif
}
/**********************************************************************/
static int
do_test(int lfd, struct sockaddr_in *conn_addr,
int closeonexec_flag, int nonblock_flag)
{
int connfd, acceptfd;
int fdf, flf, fdf_pass, flf_pass;
struct sockaddr_in claddr;
socklen_t addrlen;
printf("=======================================\n");
connfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (connfd == -1)
die("socket");
if (connect(connfd, (struct sockaddr *) conn_addr,
sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) == -1)
die("connect");
addrlen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
acceptfd = accept4(lfd, (struct sockaddr *) &claddr, &addrlen,
closeonexec_flag | nonblock_flag);
if (acceptfd == -1) {
perror("accept4()");
close(connfd);
return 0;
}
fdf = fcntl(acceptfd, F_GETFD);
if (fdf == -1)
die("fcntl:F_GETFD");
fdf_pass = ((fdf & FD_CLOEXEC) != 0) ==
((closeonexec_flag & SOCK_CLOEXEC) != 0);
printf("Close-on-exec flag is %sset (%s); ",
(fdf & FD_CLOEXEC) ? "" : "not ",
fdf_pass ? "OK" : "failed");
flf = fcntl(acceptfd, F_GETFL);
if (flf == -1)
die("fcntl:F_GETFD");
flf_pass = ((flf & O_NONBLOCK) != 0) ==
((nonblock_flag & SOCK_NONBLOCK) !=0);
printf("nonblock flag is %sset (%s)\n",
(flf & O_NONBLOCK) ? "" : "not ",
flf_pass ? "OK" : "failed");
close(acceptfd);
close(connfd);
printf("Test result: %s\n", (fdf_pass && flf_pass) ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
return fdf_pass && flf_pass;
}
static int
create_listening_socket(int port_num)
{
struct sockaddr_in svaddr;
int lfd;
int optval;
memset(&svaddr, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in));
svaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
svaddr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
svaddr.sin_port = htons(port_num);
lfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (lfd == -1)
die("socket");
optval = 1;
if (setsockopt(lfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &optval,
sizeof(optval)) == -1)
die("setsockopt");
if (bind(lfd, (struct sockaddr *) &svaddr,
sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) == -1)
die("bind");
if (listen(lfd, 5) == -1)
die("listen");
return lfd;
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct sockaddr_in conn_addr;
int lfd;
int port_num;
int passed;
passed = 1;
port_num = (argc > 1) ? atoi(argv[1]) : PORT_NUM;
memset(&conn_addr, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in));
conn_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
conn_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
conn_addr.sin_port = htons(port_num);
lfd = create_listening_socket(port_num);
if (!do_test(lfd, &conn_addr, 0, 0))
passed = 0;
if (!do_test(lfd, &conn_addr, SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0))
passed = 0;
if (!do_test(lfd, &conn_addr, 0, SOCK_NONBLOCK))
passed = 0;
if (!do_test(lfd, &conn_addr, SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK))
passed = 0;
close(lfd);
exit(passed ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE);
}
[mtk.manpages@...il.com: rewrote changelog and test program]
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists