[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081115060237.GA3910@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:02:37 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: stable@...nel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [BUG] net: fix /proc/net/snmp as memory corruptor
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 06:25:33AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 06:08:48AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Hello Greg
>>>
>>> A patch was submited about /proc/net/snmp being a memory corruptor and
>>> not SMP safe
>>>
>>> (commit b971e7ac834e9f4bda96d5a96ae9abccd01c1dd8)
>>>
>>> These bugs are present on 2.6.26 & 2.6.27.
>> I looking at this, it doesn't seem to apply at all to the .27 tree. If
>> David doesn't object, care to backport it there and send it to
>> stable@...nel.org?
>
> Strange... I just tried to apply patch on top of a fresh linux-2.6.27.6
> tree and got no error
>
> # patch -p1 < /tmp/icmp_snmp.patch
> patching file net/ipv4/proc.c
> #
I've attached the patch I tried to apply below. It fails with:
$ patch -p1 --dry-run < ../net-fix-proc-net-snmp-as-memory-corruptor.patch
patching file net/ipv4/proc.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 237.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/proc.c.rej
Any thoughts?
thanks,
greg k-h
View attachment "net-fix-proc-net-snmp-as-memory-corruptor.patch" of type "text/plain" (2639 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists