netdev - Re: [PATCH] niu: bitwise or does not imply ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081116.124924.146154114.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:49:24 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jdb@...x.dk
Cc:	miltonm@....com, segher@...nel.crashing.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] niu: bitwise or does not imply ordering

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:32:05 +0100

> 
> I have tested it on the actual hardware, it works...
> 
> I actually agree that we should make it explicit, eventhough DaveM seems
> to disagree on the netdev list.

I'm also not applying this patch for another reason.

This is a knee-jerk reaction patch, purely.  This person
saw the commit and wants to fix only _THIS_ case.

Well guess what?  If you really CARED, you'd go change this
across the whole tree.  This exact construct exists ALL
OVER the kernel.  In fact there are sequences that match
this new NIU code exactly.

Did these people complaining look for those?  No.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html