[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081116.195406.196992095.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:54:06 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: harvey.harrison@...il.com
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, kkeil@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isdn: bugfix in isdn_net_ciscohdlck_slarp_send_reply,
trivial sparse fixes
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:33:49 -0800
> commit a144ea4b7a13087081ab5402fa9ad0bcfd249e67 [IPV4]: annotate struct in_ifaddr
>
> Missed the extra byteswap because the previous isdn inline helpers
> hid the extra htonl inside put_u32. This was causing an extra byteswap
> on little-endian arches.
>
> While here, do the trivial annotation of the struct ip_ports and change
> the remaining casts to __be16 where applicable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
> Dave, the yesterday's patch was a zero-change patch that exposed this
> bug, this patch changes behavior in the above-referenced function.
Well, you've created an incredibly difficult situation for me.
The bug exists in 2.6.28-rcX but your cleanup patch was only appropriate
for net-next-2.6 so that's where it went.
But this bug fix here will only apply on top of that cleanup.
This is wrong, please propose a way to correct this so that 2.6.28-rcX can
get this bug fixed properly, without a dependency on a cleanup with is
not appropriate for 2.6.28-rcX.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists