[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9929d2390811191355k247ac638l4cb98f9c3cdc237f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:55:12 -0800
From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Network Devices Ops (v0.3)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:27:05 -0800
> "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> <shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
>> > This sequence of patches breaks the network device adminstration
>> > function table away from the network device data structure. It is
>> > a transitional API change (both keep working), and this set of patches
>> > hits a range of commonly used drivers. This should be enough to make sure
>> > both old and new interfaces get used and tested.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Did I miss a patch, or did you intentionally not convert ixgbe?
>
> Since it was so similar to ixgb, both files are patched in same patch bundle.
> --
>
Looking at this further, what is the benefit of this change? For this
massive of a change, I would expect some sort of significant benefit.
What is the driving force behind this change?
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists