netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/6] mv643xx_eth: introduce per-port register area pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:59:19 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	buytenh@...tstofly.org
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mv643xx_eth: introduce per-port register area
 pointer

From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:29:01 +0100

> The mv643xx_eth driver uses the rdl()/wrl() macros to read and
> write hardware registers.  Per-port registers are accessed in the
> following way:
> 
> 	#define PORT_STATUS(p)			(0x0444 + ((p) << 10))
> 
> 	[...]
> 
> 	static inline u32 rdl(struct mv643xx_eth_private *mp, int offset)
> 	{
> 		return readl(mp->shared->base + offset);
> 	}
> 
> 	[...]
> 
> 	port_status = rdl(mp, PORT_STATUS(mp->port_num));
> 
> By giving the per-port 'struct mv643xx_eth_private' its own
> 'void __iomem *base' pointer that points to the per-port register
> area, we can get rid of both the double indirection and the << 10
> that is done for every per-port register access -- this patch does
> that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...vell.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html