netdev - Re: [PATCH] sfc: Fix dependency for SFC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081120.041753.264904694.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:17:53 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Cc:	bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sfc: Fix dependency for SFC_MTD

From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:37:50 -0800

> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap found that SFC_MTD was selected when sfc was built-in and
> > the MTD core was a module.  Don't allow that combination.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> 
> I realized that this problem came up because SFC_MTD is a boolean
> that depends on tristates, so the boolean is set (=y) when
> SFC=y or SFC=m.  Thus extra handling for it is needed,
> like Ben did here.

Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html