[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200811201452.35527.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:52:35 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: make ip_rt_acct a normal percpu var
On Thursday 20 November 2008 09:47:54 David Miller wrote:
> We make a big fuss (rightly) about a few hundred bytes and this sucker
> is FOUR KILOBYTES.
Sure, but this is just trading 4k runtime for 4k static, ie. it's just
unhiding it. That's very different from adding random bloat.
> Really for the time being I'd rather see this converted to a
> num_possible_cpus() sized normal kzalloc() and direct indexing. I
> don't want the networking to bloat up the main kernel image by so
> much.
Nooooooo! :)
First, num_possible_cpus() is the wrong answer (if there are holes in
cpu_possible_map). Second, there's little point having percpu infrastructure
which people avoid. Third, that memory not going to be numa-aware. Fourth,
the dynamic percpu version is fewer instructions (with dynamic percpu
patches).
I've spent an hour trying to implement DEFINE_PER_CPU_ZERO(), but AFAICT it
can't be done (gas rejects "b" as a section attribute) :(
So I've dropped the patch, but I wonder if this 4k of stats should be here at
all.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists