netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/5] dccp: Mechanism to resolve CCID dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081120.010321.191266507.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:03:21 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk
Cc:	dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dccp: Mechanism to resolve CCID dependencies

From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:03:47 +0100

> | > +	list_for_each_entry(entry, fn_list, node)
> | > +		if (entry->feat_num == feat_num && entry->is_local == is_local)
> | > +			return entry;
> | > +		else if (entry->feat_num > feat_num)
> | > +			break;
> | 
> | Personally, I would have put braces around this basic block.
> | 
> If it is possible to modify without disturbance, I attach a patch for this and
> have changed it in the test tree.
> 
> I have checked that making this change does not affect subsequent
> patches - it works with either variant.

Applied, thanks Gerrit.  Please give a signoff next time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html