netdev - Re: [PATCH] fs: pipe/sockets/anon dentries should not have a parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081121152148.GA20388@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:21:48 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: pipe/sockets/anon dentries should not have a parent


* Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:

> Before patch, time to run 8 millions of close(socket()) calls on 8 
> CPUS was :
>
> real    0m27.496s
> user    0m0.657s
> sys     3m39.092s
>
> After patch :
>
> real    0m23.997s
> user    0m0.682s
> sys     3m11.193s

cool :-)

What would it take to get it down to:

>> Cost if run one one cpu :
>>
>> real    0m1.561s
>> user    0m0.092s
>> sys     0m1.469s

i guess asking for a wall-clock cost of 1.561/8 would be too much? :)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html