[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <492A40CA.1070005@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:51:06 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-next/unix: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
David Miller a écrit :
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:20:14 -0800 (PST)
>
>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:32:30 +0100
>>
>>> [PATCH] net: make sock_prot_inuse_add() preempt safe
> ...
>> Eric, you added this bug by starting to use this interface in
>> situations where BH's were not disabled.
>>
>> Ever existing use adhered to that rule.
>>
>> If you therefore want to call this interface in new locations,
>> you have to make sure those locations follow the rule too.
>
> Here is what I commited to fix this bug.
>
> net: Make sure BHs are disabled in sock_prot_inuse_add()
>
> The rule of calling sock_prot_inuse_add() is that BHs must
> be disabled. Some new calls were added where this was not
> true and this tiggers warnings as reported by Ilpo.
>
> Fix this by adding explicit BH disabling around those call sites.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 3 +++
> net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++++
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hello David
Thanks for working on this during my sleep ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists