[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <492AA058.9060302@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:38:48 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pkt_sched: sch_drr: Fix drr_dequeue() loop
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 01:15:07PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> (Changelog fixed only)
>>>
>>> pkt_sched: sch_drr: Fix drr_dequeue() loop
>>>
>>> If all child qdiscs of sch_drr are non-work-conserving (e.g. sch_tbf)
>>> drr_dequeue() will busy-loop waiting for skbs instead of leaving the
>>> job for a watchdog. Checking for list_empty() in each loop isn't
>>> necessary either, because this can never be true except the first time.
>> Thanks for the report. I don't like to overcomplicate treatment
>> of this broken configuration though, so this patch simply returns
>> NULL when the inner qdiscs is non-work-conserving.
>
> Hmm... I don't agree with treating this as broken (IIRC Denys
> Fedoryshchenko wrote about some case when he prefers TBF over HTB,
> and with DRR this could be an interesting alternative), but of course
> you are the author and I respect your decision.
TBF with an inner DRR is fine. The other way around is broken
in the sense that the behaviour is undefined.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists