netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: gen_estimator: Fix gen_kill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1227538858.22481.29.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:00:58 -0500
From:	jamal <j.hadi123@...il.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>,
	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: gen_estimator: Fix gen_kill_estimator() lookups

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 13:37 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:

> I first thought about a hash, but alas Patrick's solution is sched
> only... Anyway, I din't see too much overhead in memory use, and no
> diffrence in addition times (without batching).

Showing numbers in a commit for perf improvement IMO is always a good
thing.
BTW, I dont think it would make a noticeable difference (batching
notwithstanding) in addition or even deletion unless you have quiet a
few with the same estimate sampling time loaded.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html