netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: avoid a pair of dst_hold()/dst_release() in ip_append

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:22:32 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dada1@...mosbay.com, andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	minyard@....org, christian@...i.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: avoid a pair of dst_hold()/dst_release() in ip_append_data()

> Thinking more I believe we can do similar tricks for all TCP
> transmit traffic.

Sounds reasonable.

> 
> Packets bound to sockets never outlive those sockets (and thus
> their cached routes) unless we skb_orphan().
> 
> The only not covered case is where the socket cached route
> is reset or changed.  We could defer the dst put until the
> transmit queue reaches a certain point, kind of like a retransmit
> queue RCU :-)
> 
> Just some ideas...

netfilter makes it somewhat tricky, for compatibility you would
need to reclone the route on the fly.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html