[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081125.010943.205685748.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:09:43 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
kay.sievers@...y.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev: generate kobject uevent on network state
transitions
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:14:40 -0800
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:51:53 +0100
> Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> wrote:
>
> > > It is easier for some applications to deal with text based interfaces
> > > like uevent, rather than using netlink to listen for events.
> > >
> > > Note, this does not deal with network namespaces but that is a generic
> > > problem that already exists with kobjects (see rename events).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
...
> > do we wanna copy just what ifconfig shows or do we might be a more
> > intelligent and have separate variables like RUNNING=1 etc.?
>
> Was arbitrary choice to just use same flags as existing ifconfig.
> What ever feels best I guess...
So what do folks want me to do here? Should I put Stephen's
latest patch in, or do we want to make some kind of flags change?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists