netdev - Re: oops/warning report for the week of November 26, 2008

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081127194210.GB28870@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:42:10 -0700
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: oops/warning report for the week of November 26, 2008

* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>:
> On Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:11 pm Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Rank 2: pci_create_slot (warning)
> > 	Reported 603 times (639 total reports)
> > 	BIOS provided duplicated slot names, the PCI layer blindly passes to sysfs
> > 	This warning was last seen in version 2.6.27.5, and first seen in
> > 2.6.27-rc7-git1. More info:
> > http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=pci_create_slot
> 
> IIRC we fixed this one post-2.6.27.  I didn't send the patches back to -stable 
> because they were a bit big, but if someone were sufficiently motiviated I'm 
> sure the backport wouldn't be that hard...

I can do this backport. A few questions though...

We're seeing a proliferation of this one presumably because
Fedora10 uses 2.6.27.5 as a starting point? If I just backport
the fixes against Greg's latest tree, do I have to do anything
special to make sure they get into the Fedora kernel?

Also, does kerneloops capture any of the machine information,
like DMI output, etc. or does it just get the oops? It would be
nice to see which machines out there have the broken BIOS that
causes this oops.

Thanks.

/ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html