[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1227778999.3809.34.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:43:19 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/39] wimax: internal API for the kernel space WiMAX
stack
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 15:07 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> +static inline __must_check
> +int wimax_dev_is_ready(struct wimax_dev *wimax_dev)
> +{
> + if (wimax_dev->state == __WIMAX_ST_NULL)
> + return -EINVAL; /* Device is not even registered! */
> + if (wimax_dev->state == WIMAX_ST_DOWN)
> + return -ENOMEDIUM;
ENOLINK seems more appropriate?
> +/*
> + * The concept of a pipe -- we encapsulate it because we want to
> + * detach the usage of it from the implementation, and thus it serves
> + * just as a handle.
Might help to explain just what the concept is :)
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists