[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081128123631.5209d0b8@osprey.hogchain.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:36:31 -0600
From: Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@...il.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: oops/warning report for the week of November 26, 2008
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:32:17 -0800
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> to be specific in counts, the data I have so far is:
>
> count | guilty
> -------+----------------------------
> 1599 | dev_watchdog(sis900)
> 1501 | dev_watchdog(r8169)
> 280 | dev_watchdog(via-rhine)
> 264 | dev_watchdog(cdc_ether)
> 213 | dev_watchdog(usbnet)
> 192 | dev_watchdog(8139too)
> 164 | dev_watchdog(8390)
> 158 | dev_watchdog(via_rhine)
> 129 | dev_watchdog(ne2k-pci)
> 122 | dev_watchdog(atl1)
> 102 | dev_watchdog(atl2)
> 101 | dev_watchdog(orinoco)
> ATL1 isn't doing all that bad in this
> regard, although your driver is still a little higher than other
> popular cards like tg3, e1000, e1000e etc.
...And that's what troubles me: the L1 chip isn't what I'd characterize
as "popular" -- it's LOM only, and it's found in only about 25
mainboards that I know of (from voluntary user reports) -- yet its
prevalence in the tx timeout list seems to be quickly rising.
Can you produce a list from your database for me that includes the
kernel version for each of the 122 reported atl1 dev_watchdog warnings?
I'd like to see if I can correlate an increase in the warnings with a
particular change we made.
Thanks.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists