[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d96567b0811290010r641388b7w179bc4af26bbf103@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:10:37 +0200
From: Raz <raziebe@...il.com>
To: "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what is the expeted performance from a dual port 10G card ?
PCI Encoding overhead is 8 bits /10 bits . so 16Gbps supposed to be
the practical limit. I still lack 3 Gbps in the Intel case.
where are they ?
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> Raz wrote:
>> Hello
>> I have been testing 10G ethernet cards , intel ixgbe, chelsio, tehuti
>> and melanox . All are dual port cards.
>> I have used pktgen to test it. A single cpu is mapped over a single
>> interface (no neeed for MQ , which is quite bad anyway).
>> Results:
>> Intel gives: 13Gbps , 6.5 from each port.
>> The rest give ~10 Gbps .
>> Cards were tested on PCI-E x8 slot, on a supermicro x7DBI and
>> supermicro 1025W-UR.
>>
>> Am i to expect ~20Gbps from each card ?
>
> PCI Express provides 2.5 Gbps per lane (can be 5 Gbps in PCIe 2.0 but
> that's quite new). So an x8 slot is limited to 20 Gbps including all
> the PCIe protocol overhead, which can be substantial. You will not
> get 20 Gbps out of dual-port cards without doubling the width or lane
> speed.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists