[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493100E0.4010009@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:44:16 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org >> Kernel Testers List"
<kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] fs: Introduce a per_cpu last_ino allocator
new_inode() dirties a contended cache line to get increasing
inode numbers.
Solve this problem by providing to each cpu a per_cpu variable,
feeded by the shared last_ino, but once every 1024 allocations.
This reduce contention on the shared last_ino, and give same
spreading ino numbers than before.
(same wraparound after 2^32 allocations)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
View attachment "last_ino.patch" of type "text/plain" (1512 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists