[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081201.003821.42061993.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:38:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: yjwei@...fujitsu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfrm: Fix kernel panic when flush and dump SPD
entries
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:11:11 +0800
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:50:54PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > After flush the SPD entries, dump the SPD entries will cause kernel painc.
> >
> > Used the following commands to reproduct:
> >
> > - echo 'spdflush;' | setkey -c
> > - echo 'spdadd 3ffe:501:ffff:ff01::/64 3ffe:501:ffff:ff04::/64 any -P out ipsec \
> > ah/tunnel/3ffe:501:ffff:ff00:200:ff:fe00:b0b0-3ffe:501:ffff:ff02:200:ff:fe00:a1a1/require;\
> > spddump;' | setkey -c
> > - echo 'spdflush; spddump;' | setkey -c
> > - echo 'spdadd 3ffe:501:ffff:ff01::/64 3ffe:501:ffff:ff04::/64 any -P out ipsec \
> > ah/tunnel/3ffe:501:ffff:ff00:200:ff:fe00:b0b0-3ffe:501:ffff:ff02:200:ff:fe00:a1a1/require;\
> > spddump;' | setkey -c
> >
> > This is because when flush the SPD entries, the SPD entry is not remove
> > from the list.
> >
> > This patch fix the problem by remove the SPD entry from the list. And
> > also do clean up of remove SPD entry.
>
> I like the clean-up but it's best if you separate the two changes
> into two patches. That way it's easy to see exactly what the bug
> fix patch is trying to fix and to verify that the clean-up patch
> really doesn't change behaviour.
Agreed. Wei, please do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists