netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/13] dmaengine: introduce dma_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49356FD9.5000509@atmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:26:49 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	maciej.sosnowski@...el.com, hskinnemoen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] dmaengine: introduce dma_request_channel and private
 channels

Guennadi Liakhovetski :
> Another problem I encountered with my framebuffer is the initialisation 
> order. You initialise dmaengine per subsys_initcall(), whereas the only 
> way to guarantee the order:
> 
> dmaengine
> dma-device driver
> framebuffer
> 
> when they are all linked into the kernel was to switch dmaengine to 
> arch_initcall, put the dma driver under subsys_initcall, and the 
> framebuffer under a normal module_init / device_initcall.

I did not dig much in this but I feel also that dmaengine is initialized 
a bit late : it seems to be initialized after atmel-mci is started.
It works but it seems to me that dmaengine has to be initialized very 
early...

...my 2 cents.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html