[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4935972B.8050608@myri.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:14:35 -0500
From: Loic Prylli <loic@...i.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciaer: report config read/write errors
On 12/02/2008 02:44 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> pci_find_ext_capability would succeed but all access to registers >= 256
> would fail if MMCONFIG failed.
Your sentence seems self-contradicting to me. pci_find_ext_capability()
(!= pci_find_capability()) only tries to access registers >= 256, so I
don't see how it would succeed if *all* those accesses are failing.
> P.s: you can look back into LKML for Linus discussion about why MMCONFIG
> is broken anyway.
>
I was an active participant in one of those discussions (although it is
possible I missed a later one), so I am quite aware about the
limitations of MMCONFIG. But pci_find_ext_capability() looked to me a
good filter to check about those limitations().
This is not just about pciaer, for instance, it might be that a lot of
the SR-IOV code submitted recently assumes that if the corresponding
extended-capability can be detected, little checking needs to be done
afterwards.
Loic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists